
Exodus 21:10
Exodus 21:10
“Her food, her clothing, and her marital rights he shall not diminish.”
The inherited teaching has a history. The text does not change.
Folio 41V1008 CESt. Petersburg
See the texts
AugustineDe Civitate DeiMS, 1470NYPL Spencer 30
Illustrative artifact · does not contain this passage
What Augustine wrote in 401
Forbidden by no law.
AugustineDe Bono ConiugaliA.D. 401forbidden by no law
Augustine wrote those words in 401. They do not prove this site’s conclusion, and Augustine still told Christians in his own time to follow their custom of one wife. But his sentence does make the history more complicated than most of us were taught. You can read the Latin, the surrounding paragraphs, and the source here.
If you have never heard that part of Augustine, you may wonder how churches moved from his distinction to the certainty many teach today. The history page gathers the documents that show what happened in between.
Look closely at one Hebrew word
Here is how I would check it.
Start with a law that rarely appears in marriage teaching. Press the marked word and you will see the Hebrew, the readings ancient translators gave it, and the places you can check those readings.
שְׁאֵרָהּ כְּסוּתָהּ וְעֹנָתָהּ לֹא יִגְרָע
If he takes another for himself: her food, her clothing, and he shall not diminish. And if he does not do these three for her, she shall go out free, without payment of money.
The other passage studies work the same way. Read the sentence, look closely at the words that matter, and keep the sources close enough to open. The full Exodus page does this with the rest of the law.
Five objects across fifteen centuries
Follow the words from a Hebrew manuscript into the English Bible many of us grew up reading.

01Leningrad Codex1008 CEMasoretic

02Codex Amiatinusc. 700 CEVulgate

03Wycliffite erac. 1500English

04Tyndale NT1526John 1

05King James1611Title page
What Exodus requires of the husband
Here is what the law requires from the husband.
Exodus 21 begins with a woman who entered a household as a servant and was then made a wife. If the man later takes another wife, three things still belong to the first in full. He cannot make the new household affordable by pushing her back toward servitude. If he withholds what the law names, she leaves free and owes him nothing.
That does not make every institution in the passage good. The setting includes servitude, and a law can restrain harm without endorsing the whole setting. What the verse establishes is more specific: her standing as a wife continues, her claims remain enforceable, and the man may not make her carry the cost of his decision.
- She’er
- Food or sustenance. The exact scope is debated, but the man may not reduce what she receives.
- Kesut
- A covering or garment. Some interpreters include shelter, but clothing is the word’s direct sense.
- Onah
- Her marital rights, including companionship and intimacy. The ancient readings treat this as something owed to her.
- If he withholds them
- She leaves free and owes nothing. Marriage changed her standing, and the law does not let him turn a wife back into a servant.
What question would you want answered before reading any further?
The Questions page covers the concerns people usually raise first, including consent, abuse, Genesis, Jesus, and Paul. Each answer links to the passage or source behind it.